Modelo conceptual dirigido a docentes para explorar el bien común en las instituciones de educación superior
Resumen
El presente artículo estudia desde un enfoque holístico las actividades del bien común que deben poner en práctica los docentes. Se empieza estableciendo un contexto histórico y actual del rol de los docentes en la universidad y las funciones necesarias para servir al bien común. Se definen las actividades específicas que implican el aprendizaje-servicio, la investigación basada en la comunidad y ciertas formas de servicio profesional como las más relevantes para el compromiso debido a su conexión directa con las funciones de enseñanza, investigación y servicio de los docentes. El artículo presenta el modelo del Bien Común Docente (MBCD), resultado de una amplia revisión bibliográfica, y ofrece una perspectiva global en la que se esbozan los factores personales, profesionales e institucionales que pueden predecir la participación de los docentes en el bien común.
Citas
Anafinova, S. (2020). The role of rankings in higher education policy: Coercive and normative isomorphism in Kazakhstani higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102246.
Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The journal of higher education, 73(1), 94-122.
Bayrak, T. (2020). A content analysis of top-ranked universities’ mission statements from five global regions. International Journal of Educational Development, 72, 102130.
Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 48(6), 648-669.
Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, and the Common Good. ERIC.
Boyadjieva, P., & Ilieva-Trichkova, P. (2019). From conceptualisation to measurement of higher education as a common good: challenges and possibilities. Higher Education, 77, 1047-1063.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. ERIC.
Carrell, S. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 409-432.
Colbeck, C. L., & Wharton‐Michael, P. (2006). Individual and organizational influences on faculty members' engagement in public scholarship. New directions for teaching and learning, 2006(105), 17-26.
Cuesta-Moreno, Ó. J. (2018). Reconocimiento social del docente universitario: subjetividad agobiada, puja por el prestigio académico y reivindicación del acto educativo. El Ágora USB, 18(1), 55-72.
Davies, P., & Ercolani, M. G. (2021). Gender, motivation and labour market beliefs in higher education choices. Higher Education, 82(1), 127-144.
Dorn, C. (2017). For the common good: A new history of higher education in America. Cornell University Press.
Eckel, P. D. (2008). Mission diversity and the tension between prestige and effectiveness: An overview of US higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 175-192.
Fischer, E., & Hänze, M. (2020). How do university teachers’ values and beliefs affect their teaching? Educational Psychology, 40(3), 296-317.
Ford, M. P. (2016). Education for the common good. Academe, 102(5), 16-19.
García Aguilar, L. C., Forero Pulido, C., Ocampo Rivera, D. C., & Madrigal Ramírez, M. C. (2015). The meaning of teaching and learning for professors. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 33(1), 8-16.
Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. John Wiley & Sons.
Godfrey, P. C., & Grasso, E. T. (2000). Working for the common good: Concepts and models for service-learning in management. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Hackett, E. J. (2014). Academic capitalism. In (Vol. 39, pp. 635-638): Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Hativa, N., & Goodyear, J. (2001). Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hinck, S. S., & Brandell, M. E. (2000). The relationship between institutional support and campus acceptance of academic service learning. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 868-881.
Holland, B. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan journal of community service learning, 4(1), 30-41.
Holland, B. A. (2005). Institutional differences in pursuing the public good. Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement, 235-259.
Hollenbach, D. (2002). The common good and Christian ethics (Vol. 22). Cambridge University Press.
Jeynes, W. H. (2007). American educational history: School, society, and the common good. Sage.
Jones, K. M. (2012). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as scholarship for promotion and tenure—a book review. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), 56.
Knowles, R. T., & Clark, C. H. (2018). How common is the common good? Moving beyond idealistic notions of deliberative democracy in education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 12-23.
Kober, N. (2007). Why We Still Need Public Schools: Public Education for the Common Good. Center on Education Policy.
London, A. J. (2021). For the common good: Philosophical foundations of research ethics. Oxford University Press.
Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2017). Education and the common good. Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future, 63-76.
Lozano, E. V., & Lagla, G. A. L. (2018). Los roles del docente universitario en la actualidad. Revista Científica Retos de la Ciencia, 2(4), 26-31.
Macfarlane, B. (2011). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57-73.
Neumann, A., & Terosky, A. L. (2007). To give and to receive: Recently tenured professors' experiences of service in major research universities. The journal of higher education, 78(3), 282-310.
Nybom, T. (2003). The Humboldt legacy: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the European university. Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 141-159.
Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 573-593.
San Fabián, J. L. (2020). El reconocimiento de la actividad investigadora universitaria como mecanismo de regulación del mercado académico. Márgenes Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga, 1(1), 23-44.
Scott, J. W. (2019). Knowledge for the Common Good. Academe, 105(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26945164
Smith, P. A., & Shoho, A. R. (2007). Higher education trust, rank and race: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 125-138.
Sormani, E., Baaken, T., & van der Sijde, P. (2022). What sparks academic engagement with society? A comparison of incentives appealing to motives. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 19-36.
Staley, D. J. (2019). Alternative universities: Speculative design for innovation in higher education. JHU Press.
Staton, A. Q., & Hunt, S. L. (1992). Teacher socialization: Review and conceptualization. Communication education, 41(2), 109-137.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Higher education for sustainability: a global overview of commitment and progress. Higher education in the world, 4(1), 18-28.
Trolian, T. L., & Jach, E. A. (2020). Engagement in college and university applied learning experiences and students’ academic motivation. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(3), 317-335.
Valeeva, E. E., & Kraysman, N. V. (2014). The impact of globalization on changing roles of university professors. 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL),
Vogelgesang, L. J., Denson, N., & Jayakumar, U. M. (2010). What determines faculty-engaged scholarship? The Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 437-472.
Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47, 129-148.
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty Service Roles and the Scholarship of Engagement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. ERIC.
Wilkesmann, U., & J. Schmid, C. (2014). Intrinsic and internalized modes of teaching motivation. Evidence-based HRM: a global forum for empirical scholarship,
Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T. (2019). Institutional factors for academic entrepreneurship in publicly owned universities in japan: Transition from a conservative anti-industry university collaboration culture to a leading entrepreneurial university. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 423-445.
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.